According to William Hasker, the existential problem of evil occurs when “theism is questioned and/or rejected on the basis of moral protest, indignation, and outrage at the evils of this world.” Hasker claims that if I am glad that I exist, then I cannot (reasonably) protest against God. The simple version of his argument is: (1) I am glad that I exist. (2) If I am glad that I exist, then I am glad that the history of the world is the way it is. (3) If I am glad that the history of the world is what it is, then I cannot reproach God for the general character or the major events of the world’s past history. (4) Therefore, I cannot reproach God for the general character or the major events of the world’s past history. (1) is based on an assumption. Hasker asks us to think for a moment. On the whole, do you prefer that you exist rather than not? If so, then proceed. (2) is based on a thesis about human identity. Hasker argues that you being you is conting...